Sweden is sunsetting a big part of its payment infrastructure. Bankgirot services like supplier payments (Leverantörsbetalningar), salary runs (BG-Lön), and image-based reconciliations are being phased out. In their place? ISO 20022-based, bank-specific integrations.
Sounds simple on paper. It’s not.
By end of 2026, most corporate and ERP-initiated payment flows will need to bypass Bankgirot and go directly to each bank. Every bank is implementing its own version of payment formats, validations, and cutoffs. That means:
ERP vendors and corporates' finance teams are suddenly integration shops. Banks are suddenly service providers. Everyone is re-learning how to pay and get paid.
When you split a unified flow into 10+ fragmented ones, bad things happen:
The shift to ISO 20022 is not just a tech upgrade. It’s a financial control risk.
If a client needs six different formats to initiate payments to six banks, they’ll consolidate business to the one that makes it easy.
Smart banks will:
If you’re a bank trying to keep your corporate base post-DCL, this is not just a format game. It’s a retention play.
Before: one channel, full visibility.
After: fragmented logic, missing balances, more errors.
Unless you rebuild:
What used to be a finance dashboard becomes a series of spreadsheets overnight.
Rebuilding all these integrations internally is costly, error-prone, and distracts from your core product. It’s also likely to put you behind market expectations.
Option A: Maintain dozens of brittle, bank-specific flows. Hope they don’t break.
Option B: Partner with platforms that abstract this mess, validate flows, and return one normalized response.
You already know which is more scalable.
Visualizy is the control layer for this new world:
You focus on your finance operation. We handle the plumbing.
This shift is coming. It’s not optional.
If you want to talk use-cases, pilots, or transition strategies, we’re here.